EFFICIENCY OF HIGH-POWER LASER VERSUS PULSED ELECTROMAGNETIC THERAPY ON HEMIPLEGIC SHOULDER PAIN

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 B.Sc. of Physical Therapy, physical therapist outpatient clinics Faculty of Physical Therapy Cairo University

2 Professor and Chairperson of the Department of Physical Therapy for Neuromuscular and Neurosurgical Disorder and Its Surgery, Faculty of Physical Therapy Cairo University

3 Lecturer of Neurology and Neurosurgery , Faculty of Medicine Cairo University

4 Lecturer of Physical Therapy for Neuromuscular and Neurosurgical Disorder and Its Surgery, Faculty of Physical Therapy Cairo University

10.21608/iptccu.2025.437981

Abstract

Background:
Among stroke survivors, hemiplegic shoulder pain (HSP) is a prevalent disorder that frequently hinders recovery and quality of life. There is considerable disagreement over the best therapeutic strategy despite the availability of therapy options. Although there is little direct comparative data, high-power laser therapy (HPLT) and pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMF) are new non-invasive techniques with encouraging results.
Purpose:
This study compared the efficacy of high-power laser therapy versus pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in treating patients with chronic hemiplegic shoulder pain in terms of pain reduction, shoulder function improvement, and range of motion enhancement.
Subjects & Methods:
42 stroke patients who had chronic HSP participated in a randomized controlled experiment. Group A got high-power laser therapy, Group B got pulsed electromagnetic field therapy, and Group C got standard exercises. The participants were divided randomly into three groups. Treatment sessions were given three times a week for four weeks. The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were used to evaluate shoulder function and pain, and digital goniometric was used to measure the range of motion of shoulder flexion, abduction, and external rotation.
Conclusion:
All three interventions significantly reduced pain and improved function and range of motion. HPLT produced the highest percentage of clinical improvement, followed by PEMF, while conventional exercise showed the least improvement. Although statistical differences between groups were not significant, HPLT showed superior clinical outcomes and limited statistical superiority especially for HPLT over exercises in shoulder flexion active range of motion. These results suggest, HPLT may be a more effective treatment option for chronic HSP.

Keywords

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics